Starting with the 1990's series of five through hundred dollar Federal Reserve Notes, the legend "Washington, D.C.", which has been on just about every issue previously, was removed. Why?
Most Commented Posts
- August 8, 2008 -- Should "In God We Trust" Remain On American Currency? (41)
- February 26, 2009 -- Xtian: What right (specifically) would be violated by removing "In God We Trust" from US currency? (41)
- January 27, 2010 -- Do conservatives invest in gold because they have no faith in American currency? (37)
- November 24, 2008 -- Is “In God We Trust” on US currency a true statement? (35)
- January 3, 2009 -- Should the motto “In God We Trust” be removed from U.S. currency? ? (34)
- March 17, 2009 -- R&S what do you feel about "One nation under God" on US currency? (34)
- April 21, 2009 -- What would be the impact on American society if "In God We Trust" were removed from the currency? (34)
- May 7, 2008 -- Who else thinks that "in god we trust" should be removed from US currency? (33)
- January 9, 2009 -- Are coins and currency the same thing? (30)
- March 8, 2010 -- If your good looks were currency, what could you buy? (30)
This entry was posted
on Monday, March 31st, 2008 at 10:29 am and is filed under Currency Trading.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
March 31st, 2008 at 10:29 am
When they redesigned the notes to the new large image type, it may not have fit in. There was no law on having Washington D.C anyway.It is also kind of out of place to have Washington D.C and the note printed in Forth worth Texas. Note has FW on it. The one dollar bill has the Washington DC as well as the FW if printed at the Fort Worth plant which may confuse things. Things happen to move from on place to another when new concepts of coins or currency are made. We the collector or consumer are the last to know.