Or was it more to do with feeding the poor through your own means, or clothing the homeless in your own clothes?
Direct Charity, as opposed to Indirect Charity.
Most Commented Posts
- August 8, 2008 -- Should "In God We Trust" Remain On American Currency? (41)
- February 26, 2009 -- Xtian: What right (specifically) would be violated by removing "In God We Trust" from US currency? (41)
- January 27, 2010 -- Do conservatives invest in gold because they have no faith in American currency? (37)
- November 24, 2008 -- Is “In God We Trust” on US currency a true statement? (35)
- January 3, 2009 -- Should the motto “In God We Trust” be removed from U.S. currency? ? (34)
- March 17, 2009 -- R&S what do you feel about "One nation under God" on US currency? (34)
- April 21, 2009 -- What would be the impact on American society if "In God We Trust" were removed from the currency? (34)
- May 7, 2008 -- Who else thinks that "in god we trust" should be removed from US currency? (33)
- January 9, 2009 -- Are coins and currency the same thing? (30)
- March 8, 2010 -- If your good looks were currency, what could you buy? (30)
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009 at 2:56 am and is filed under Currency Trading.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
February 3rd, 2009 at 2:56 am
all of those
February 3rd, 2009 at 2:56 am
The act of Charity is to help others that are in need . I for one will buy the meal for a drunkard .But give a family money for the Children cloths and food . Cash donations are as well delivered through a Rabbi, Priest ,Minister , or soup kitchen .
February 3rd, 2009 at 2:56 am
It depends with the mind of the giver
February 3rd, 2009 at 2:56 am
All three forms are good. I personally would rather take a street beggar to lunch than give him cash, because that way I know he gets fed. This opinion is coloured by my own time on the streets.