when & why was the use of the gold replaced by a designated currency as a measure of a countries wealth?
Most Commented Posts
- August 8, 2008 -- Should "In God We Trust" Remain On American Currency? (41)
- February 26, 2009 -- Xtian: What right (specifically) would be violated by removing "In God We Trust" from US currency? (41)
- January 27, 2010 -- Do conservatives invest in gold because they have no faith in American currency? (37)
- November 24, 2008 -- Is “In God We Trust” on US currency a true statement? (35)
- January 3, 2009 -- Should the motto “In God We Trust” be removed from U.S. currency? ? (34)
- March 17, 2009 -- R&S what do you feel about "One nation under God" on US currency? (34)
- April 21, 2009 -- What would be the impact on American society if "In God We Trust" were removed from the currency? (34)
- May 7, 2008 -- Who else thinks that "in god we trust" should be removed from US currency? (33)
- January 9, 2009 -- Are coins and currency the same thing? (30)
- March 8, 2010 -- If your good looks were currency, what could you buy? (30)
This entry was posted on Sunday, March 1st, 2009 at 6:44 am and is filed under Currency Trading. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
March 1st, 2009 at 6:44 am
The secret answer is that it hasn't. The Federal Reserve Bank in New York, keeps stacks of gold moving around that represent the wealth of nations, and moves them around. It's kept there "as a service to the other countries".
The answer why that people will give is that gold has no intrinsic, value. This is also true; gold has no intrinsic value (although it's nice in that if the SHTF you can use a touchstone and estimate its purity without, say, a mass spectrometer). In fact, it's a nearly useless metal. Chemists struggle to find uses for gold (as compared to platinum, palladium, niobium, iridium, rhodium, etc which have tons of uses). So if monetary value is kind of arbitrary, why not just call a spade a spade and let currencies float?
Some people will say that there's not enough gold to cover the amount of currency; but that's not true because the price of gold *could* rise so that the amount in reserves could cover the amount of circulating and digital currency.
The answer that some people will give is that the power to inflate the currency gives government the power over people's pocketbooks, which is a very powerful power indeed.
March 1st, 2009 at 6:44 am
Simply because there isn't nearly enough gold on the planet to cover how much currency there is. It happened long ago.